ObjFW  Check-in [6d4eb68bdf]

Overview
Comment:README.md: Fix typo
Downloads: Tarball | ZIP archive | SQL archive
Timelines: family | ancestors | descendants | both | trunk
Files: files | file ages | folders
SHA3-256: 6d4eb68bdfadc694c9f0d0a017f39dd7196d298b2d2d50da37371b294648e3d0
User & Date: js on 2024-08-17 10:10:56
Other Links: manifest | tags
Context
2024-08-17
10:46
README.md: Move most of the content to the wiki check-in: ba6455ba6f user: js tags: trunk
10:11
README.md: Fix typo check-in: 0ac7e646b4 user: js tags: 1.1
10:10
README.md: Fix typo check-in: 6d4eb68bdf user: js tags: trunk
09:51
Move private functions into private headers check-in: b829f3e798 user: js tags: trunk
Changes

Modified README.md from [5c05fa6b7d] to [beb01a6b4e].

50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
  compatible with GCC ≥ 4.6 to allow maximum portability.

  ObjFW is intentionally incompatible with Foundation. This has two reasons:

   * GNUstep already provides a reimplementation of Foundation, which is only
     compatible to a certain degree. This means that a developer still needs to
     care about differences between frameworks if they want to be portable. The
     idea behind ObjFW is that a developer does not need to concern themselves
     with portability and making sure their code works with multiple
     frameworks: Instead, if it works it ObjFW on one platform, they can
     reasonably expect it to also work with ObjFW on another platform. ObjFW
     behaving differently on different operating systems (unless inevitable
     because it is a platform-specific part, like the Windows Registry) is
     considered a bug and will be fixed.
   * Foundation predates a lot of modern Objective-C concepts. The most
     prominent one is exceptions, which are only used in Foundation as a
     replacement for `abort()`. This results in cumbersome error handling,







|

|







50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
  compatible with GCC ≥ 4.6 to allow maximum portability.

  ObjFW is intentionally incompatible with Foundation. This has two reasons:

   * GNUstep already provides a reimplementation of Foundation, which is only
     compatible to a certain degree. This means that a developer still needs to
     care about differences between frameworks if they want to be portable. The
     idea behind ObjFW is that developers do not need to concern themselves
     with portability and making sure their code works with multiple
     frameworks: Instead, if it works with ObjFW on one platform, they can
     reasonably expect it to also work with ObjFW on another platform. ObjFW
     behaving differently on different operating systems (unless inevitable
     because it is a platform-specific part, like the Windows Registry) is
     considered a bug and will be fixed.
   * Foundation predates a lot of modern Objective-C concepts. The most
     prominent one is exceptions, which are only used in Foundation as a
     replacement for `abort()`. This results in cumbersome error handling,