ObjFW  History of tests/OFSHA1HashTests.m of 67917b918a4aff25

It's generally uncommon to prefix those.

Additionally, it might be worthwhile to try to get those actually
registered, which requires usage. (check-in: [9b3cae6cba] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1784) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

Embedded files are available via the objfw-embedded: URL scheme. (check-in: [1483709ab2] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1819) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

Before, -[digest] would do the final calculation, however, this would
mean a property modifies state, which is bad. (check-in: [82801897d3] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1724) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

ObjFW's style changed over the years, but the tests were never adjusted
to it. (check-in: [14f1e22d79] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1652) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

With this property, it's possible to specify whether the memory should
be protected from swapping or not. This makes it easier for e.g. the
crypto hash classes: They can now just always use OFSecureData without
wasting unswappable memory if it's not needed. (check-in: [e629dc83a9] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1732) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

OFAutoreleasePools have long been discouraged in favor of the runtime's
autorelease pools. (check-in: [09be825f88] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1670) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

This prevents forgetting to add an import to ObjFW.h, as the tests would
then not compile. (check-in: [dc0c6c34ab] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1680) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

This removes "b" for binary and always uses binary, as there is no good
reason to not use binary. (check-in: [23e57c5040] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1791) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

Forgot to add 2017, even though I already did quite some changes in
2017. (check-in: [44f45c2e35] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1792) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

OFHash is too generic, as this protocol is for cryptographic hashes. It
also solves the ambiguity of the +[hash] method (which is now
+[cryptoHash]), which conflicted with -[hash] on the class itself,
resulting in classes conforming to OFHash not being able to be used as a
key in an OFDictionary. (check-in: [951f530aee] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1661) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

While at it, also update the mail address. (check-in: [2a27cf3000] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1649) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

Took me some time to figure out the RFC is buggy and SSIG0(t-15) should
be SSIG0(W(t-15))... (check-in: [46af1252a5] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1639) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]