ObjFW  History of tests/OFSHA1HashTests.m of efe09b8894456d6b

It's generally uncommon to prefix those.

Additionally, it might be worthwhile to try to get those actually
registered, which requires usage. file: [76d8541713] check-in: [9b3cae6cba] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1784 [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

Embedded files are available via the objfw-embedded: URL scheme. file: [8dbe2b957f] check-in: [1483709ab2] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1819 [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

Before, -[digest] would do the final calculation, however, this would
mean a property modifies state, which is bad. file: [f5847018f6] check-in: [82801897d3] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1724 [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

ObjFW's style changed over the years, but the tests were never adjusted
to it. file: [4f485b9d65] check-in: [14f1e22d79] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1652 [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

With this property, it's possible to specify whether the memory should
be protected from swapping or not. This makes it easier for e.g. the
crypto hash classes: They can now just always use OFSecureData without
wasting unswappable memory if it's not needed. file: [314899ff02] check-in: [e629dc83a9] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1732 [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

OFAutoreleasePools have long been discouraged in favor of the runtime's
autorelease pools. file: [24505cc96a] check-in: [09be825f88] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1670 [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

This prevents forgetting to add an import to ObjFW.h, as the tests would
then not compile. file: [c459854e29] check-in: [dc0c6c34ab] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1680 [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

This removes "b" for binary and always uses binary, as there is no good
reason to not use binary. file: [9caa66a935] check-in: [23e57c5040] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1791 [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

Forgot to add 2017, even though I already did quite some changes in
2017. file: [33eb237c28] check-in: [44f45c2e35] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1792 [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

OFHash is too generic, as this protocol is for cryptographic hashes. It
also solves the ambiguity of the +[hash] method (which is now
+[cryptoHash]), which conflicted with -[hash] on the class itself,
resulting in classes conforming to OFHash not being able to be used as a
key in an OFDictionary. file: [283cdacad0] check-in: [951f530aee] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1661 [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

While at it, also update the mail address. file: [bf86cfa1fb] check-in: [2a27cf3000] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1649 [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]

Took me some time to figure out the RFC is buggy and SSIG0(t-15) should
be SSIG0(W(t-15))... file: [69a50de9f5] check-in: [46af1252a5] user: js, branch: trunk, size: 1639 [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [diff]