Differences From Artifact [99bb5b0a56]:
- File tests/OFNumberTests.m — part of check-in [3b97fc3cd9] at 2014-01-04 00:24:08 on branch trunk — Update copyright. (user: js, size: 1823) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using]
To Artifact [3fe6749543]:
- File
tests/OFNumberTests.m
— part of check-in
[366681bebe]
at
2014-06-26 00:58:57
on branch trunk
— OFNumber: Remove methods for arithmetic
These methods encouraged doing arithmetic on objects rather than getting
the C type value, doing the arithmetic and creating a new object. They
didn't do anything else internally, and so doing this manually isn't
slower - it's even faster if you do multiple operations, as no temporary
objects are created then.Another advantage of this is that there are no longer uncertainties
about types of different OFNumber objects when doing arithmetic, as the
user has to be explicit about the types when getting the C type value
and thus knows which types will be used for the arithmetic. (user: js, size: 1220) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using]
| ︙ | ︙ | |||
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 | (num = [OFNumber numberWithIntMax: 123456789])) TEST(@"-[isEqual:]", [num isEqual: [OFNumber numberWithUInt32: 123456789]]) TEST(@"-[hash]", [num hash] == 0x82D8BC42) | < | < < < < < < | < < < < < < < < < < < | 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 | (num = [OFNumber numberWithIntMax: 123456789])) TEST(@"-[isEqual:]", [num isEqual: [OFNumber numberWithUInt32: 123456789]]) TEST(@"-[hash]", [num hash] == 0x82D8BC42) TEST(@"-[charValue]", [num charValue] == 21) TEST(@"-[doubleValue]", [num doubleValue] == 123456789.L) [pool drain]; } @end |