Differences From Artifact [8f8be6243f]:
- File
src/instance.h
— part of check-in
[b7097a67b6]
at
2015-06-14 10:45:10
on branch trunk
— Add OF_NONNULL / OF_NULLABLE and use that instead
Using __nonnull directly doesn't work on systems using glibc, as glibc
defines __nonnull as a parameterized define. While this does not fix the
problem of Clang introducing __nonnull even though it conflicts with
glibc, this at least means it's possible again to compile things with
versions of Clang that don't support __nonnull on systems with glibc. (user: js, size: 818) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using]
To Artifact [4dd0773bd7]:
- File
src/instance.h
— part of check-in
[d526d938d7]
at
2015-11-21 18:35:39
on branch trunk
— Remove OF_NULLABLE / OF_NONNULL
Now that Clang switched to use _Nullable and _Nonnull instead of
__nullable / __nonnull, there is no longer a conflict with glibc, which
means we can just define _Nullable / _Nonnull to nothing if they are not
understood by the compiler (which did not work with __nullable /
__nonnull due to this conflict).This also defines _Null_unspecified to nothing if unavailable. (user: js, size: 814) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using]
︙ | ︙ | |||
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 | #import "macros.h" OF_ASSUME_NONNULL_BEGIN #ifdef __cplusplus extern "C" { #endif | | | 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 | #import "macros.h" OF_ASSUME_NONNULL_BEGIN #ifdef __cplusplus extern "C" { #endif extern id objc_constructInstance(Class _Nullable, void *_Nullable); extern void* objc_destructInstance(id); #ifdef __cplusplus } #endif OF_ASSUME_NONNULL_END |